Exhausting the Options
A study into hydrogen fuel-cell buses being conducted by UNSW's Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets could pave the way to cleaner, safer future by reducing emissions of the fumes that damage our health.
Diesel fuel is powering our buses but it’s also clogging our lungs and
costing billions of dollars in health expenses related to respiratory
problems, lung inflammations and cancer.
As a result, 10 European cities and Perth in Australia are each trialling
three identical fuel-cell buses powered by compressed hydrogen, which
do not release carbon dioxide or the carcinogenic particles that damage
our lungs.
Associate Professor Tony Owen, co-director of the Centre for Energy
and Environmental Markets (CEEM) at UNSW, has been studying the
viability of hydrogen fuel-cell technology based on the buses operating
in Perth. The study is funded by the Department for Planning and
Infrastructure in Western Australia as part of its Sustainable Transport
Energy for Perth (STEP) program.
“Hydrogen is an energy carrier, it’s not a fuel,” explains Professor
Owen. “Electricity is also an energy carrier, but the major problem with
electric cars and buses is they must carry batteries on board that need
recharging at regular intervals. This problem doesn’t exist for fuel-cell
buses, since the power is produced on board.
“Provided the hydrogen comes from a renewable source, fuel-cell
vehicles produce near-zero air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions,
and reduce reliance on oil, an increasing proportion of which must be
imported from the Middle East,” he says.
But with a price tag of $2 million per bus, the costs of using fuel-cell
buses must be offset by the benefits of the cleaner urban environment
they deliver. This is not the case in Perth, but in Europe, where pollution
levels are higher, the benefits of the buses are more likely to exceed their
additional costs, according to Professor Owen.
“I suspect more cities will join in the trials. Beijing is getting a large
number of the buses for the Olympic Games, and the Japanese are
doing a lot of research into fuel-cell buses and cars because they import
100 percent of their oil, mainly from the Middle East.
CEEM is a collaboration between the faculties of Commerce and
Economics, and Engineering. Professor Hugh Outhred, of the School of
Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, is the other director of
the Centre, which opened in mid-2004 as a UNSW initiative in response
to a government review of local infrastructure industries such as the
electricity, gas and water markets.
In fact, Owen says research into energy and environmental markets
is a massive area of interest to governments looking to reduce the
damage pollution causes to public health, the environment and the
economy.
“A number of studies have actually quantified the damage to health
and mortality caused by air pollution. The combustion of diesel fuel
causes greenhouse gas emissions, but far more costly are the emissions
of particulate matter or black smoke and soot, which are very dangerous
to health,” he says.
CEEM is working with a range of institutions to assess alternative
energies, such as the Australian Greenhouse Office, which has invested
$660,000 in a three-year study into using wind energy in the Australian
national electricity market.
Another interesting study is being funded by the Australian Stock
Exchange, and conducted in conjunction with CSIRO Sustainable
Ecosystems, to develop experimental economic tools that demonstrate
how markets for environmental products work.
CEEM is sharing its research findings with universities and power
companies in Australia, Thailand, China, Ireland, Korea, Spain and
Taiwan, where it has hosted a series of workshops.
This article has been edited from the May 2006 Edition of Uniken, UNSW's monthly magazine.
This entry was posted by Blogpur, on
Sunday, May 21, 2006.
You can leave your response.
10:49 PM
Hi Venkat.
I have started a new blog at WordPress. I wish to know your candid opinion the same. Henceforth I am planning to blog on word press.
Please vist www.yeskarthi.wordpress.com
9:50 PM
fuel cell, electric vehicles etc. are all excellent options, but the question is how is the H2, electricity is being generated.
all the commercial H2 is generated by electrolysis, which means that electricity is involed, and most electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels, or nuclear power plants.
so if conversion losses are taken into account, it requires more fossil fuel to run an electric/ fuel cell based automobile.
1:11 PM
Thanks for stopping by Ankur. It is a cyclical problem, but I do feel that if other systems are used to generate electricity then perhaps we can look at long term use of such buses and vehicles. Nuclear power is the only way forward, but there are drawbacks we all know to that as well. It is a quagmire but we have to do something about it. Ethanol is a good alternative, but again there are problems.
2:32 PM
the most promising technology in everyday commuting is the simplest age old car pool, omnibusses, tram/rail transport system.
they have the least per person emission and energy consumption, and is the only solution traffic congesstion and accidents.
all cars, taxis going through the busy city centres should have mandatory co-passengers.
A european will ask for a dedicated bicycle lane, but being an indian I will be contended with an unencroached pedistrian pavement.
7:57 PM
Oh yes, especially here in Sydney, usage of cars is atrocious. Daily I see people drive big jeeps and 4WD's singly just going to office. Trains are the most important of all still.
If we can manage an unencroached pedestrian pavement in India, I will indeed be impressed.